Thursday, August 27, 2015
Divide and Conquer?
I was scrolling through my feed and I came across this post and I think that it deserves some attention. What this post is doing is pointing out that every group of people have those within' its ranks that poorly represent the group as a whole. In the images here wee see those stereotypes of violence associated with 4 groups of people: Mexican, Middle Eastern, black, and white. The problem is not with the line "How some ______ (people) are." The problem is with, "How society sees ______ (people)." Look at the second image in each pair. The only set where the second image is different than the first is the one regarding white people. Why is this, "How society sees white people?"
Before we start pointing fingers and screaming "racist" let's focus on why it is that society sees everyone as the second image in each pair. We all KNOW, regardless of what you say or post, in person or on social networking sites, you KNOW in your heart that not all of a people represent the stereotypes attached to them. There are some people in one group that may not know a single person in another group. So why does "society" see certain groups of people a certain way? Could it be that many of the sources from which we receive our information portray them that way? I didn't grow up around Mexicans and very, very few Middle Easterners (I don't like the way the term "Arab" sounds).
I grew up around black and white people so I know that the first image in the pair regarding those two groups are correct. I had the fortune of serving with, working with, and meeting Mexicans and Middle Easterners, along with many others once I went out into the world, so I know now that the first images in those sets are correct as well. I have also been to Mexico, have lived in areas with a where there have been a large number of Hispanics, and have been to the Middle East. In all cases involving ALL peoples I have seen both the good and the bad. I happen to be in the Middle East (Iraq) during a time of war, yet met some of the NICEST people I have ever crossed paths with in my entire life.
What I'm getting at is that the way a society views people is based on the information they receive, and a lot of that information comes second-hand from individuals with an agenda. Again, look at the second image in each set. What is the message that you are being fed by this? What do "they" want you to think of these people?
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Kappa's Response to a "White People Must Start 'Owning Their Actions'" Post
White people must start "owning their actions" -Chris Rock (via Uncle Sam's Misguided Children)
Okay, so originally this was going to just be a response to
a post on Facebook. When I realized that I had to open a blank word document in
order to tackle this issue it became much more. I’m not going to meticulously
fact check everything, but clarify, attempt to define, and show what I think is
wrong with this post. Let’s start with the Chris Rock quote with emphasis on “owning
their actions.” What actions is he talking about? The post does not clarify,
but we assume that it is something negative when it is an action that must be “owned.”
While the quote does not say exactly what action must be owned, the creator of
the second half of the post apparently thinks that it is the issues of slavery,
ghettos, police violence, and civil unrest. I will try to keep my responses unbiased,
but I can’t make any promises.
"Yeah... we need to stop feeling guilty for shit we didn't do."
I'm reminded of a line often heard in social-type circles in regards to "minorities" and being questioned, detained, or resisting arrest; "If you're innocent then you have nothing to be afraid of." What this eludes to is that if the individual does exhibit non-compliance when being questioned, detained, or is resisting arrest they actually may be guilty of something.
“It was black people who sold other black
people into slavery…”
True, in Africa they captured peoples from other tribes
and sold or traded them to the slave catchers. We also know that historically
this has happened to more than just black people. The thing that people seem to
not be able to wrap their heads around is that the practice of slavery ended
just 150 years ago. So, yes, you can say that other races were enslaved, but in
the context of time black people have just recently been set free in this
country. The best way to look at the effect of this on modern times would be to
see it sort of like a “cultural Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.” It’s not like slavery was abolished and
everything was cool. No, after slavery black people where still treated
less than equal, harassed, hurt, oppressed, denied service, and even killed
because of the COLOR of their skin. That is not something that you can just get
over. While the most extreme measures are very few and far between, they still
exist. Black people DO have parents, grandparents, great grandparents, and even
first-hand experience to a treatment that some people believe is over and
done.
“…and the first slave owner in America was black.”
I know
that there are many people who prided themselves on this one “gotcha” myth, but
the first slave owner in America was NOT black. This believed “first slave
owner,” Anthony Johnson, or as early records called him, “Antonio a Negro,”
arrived in Virginia in 1621 and worked on a tobacco plantation. He claimed 250
acres of land in 1651 which he received for buying the contract of an
indentured servant. This servitude was to be for “7 or 8 years” but Johnson intended
to keep the servant longer than that. Slavery was first codified in the
colonies in 1641 which meant that it probably existed there prior to that date.
Sorry to rain on people’s parades, but they can take that whole “first slave
owner was black” argument off the table. There just is not enough documented
evidence from that time to determine when or to whom the first actual slaves
belonged. But I’m sure that the facts
won’t matter to some people.
“All ghettos in America are run
by Democrats...”
You see how this went political. It’s a sure sign that the post
has a political agenda and that is once again aimed to fire up
Republicans/Conservatives. Okay then, let’s go that route. When we say “ghetto”
are we talking about poor housing projects in big cities where “minorities”
live, or are we talking about low cost housing with collections of people who
live in poverty? Larger cities tend to have a more forward or progressive view
over the smaller cities and towns. These forward thinkers tend to vote for
forward thinkers, a.k.a. Democrats. If we see ghettos as collections of people
living in poverty then that would be a majority of the southern states and
those states that tend to vote Republican. Another thing, white people are
Democrats too. Saying “All the ghettos in America are run by Democrats…” sounds
like political and racial divide are one in the same.
“...and more
white people are shot and killed by cops than are black people.”
This is completely
misleading and is another “fact” that needs to be put into perspective. First
let’s ask from when until when? Is it saying in the past 10, 25, 50, 100 years?
It doesn’t say. Why were these white people killed? It doesn’t say. I can do
the same, check this out: There have been more car accidents than truck
accidents. Without giving specifics it becomes bullshit because it’s the REASON
for the numbers, not the numbers themselves. For example, more cars have been
in accidents because of drunk drivers. See, there is a specific reason, not
just one group versus another.
“Last time I checked, it was
black people looting their own businesses and killing their own people.”
Okay,
if we watch the news we see instances of looting where the majority of the
people committing these crimes are black people and these are business in their
own communities, which in turn affect their own communities. Now let’s look at
looting that takes place on a larger, national scale. Let’s use financial
crisis of 2008 where, these large corporations stole, and continue to steal
from the American people. Everyone was affected. Not just a black community
here, or a white community there, EVERYONE. While looting and burning one’s own
community is bad we can ignore the looting and burning done by these financial institutions
on a daily basis. And if we want to talk about killing our own, let’s talk
about the number of people who die each year because they either cannot afford
the medical attention they need, their state does not want to expand Medicaid in
order for them to be able to receive the coverage that they need, or the state
closes clinics like Planned Parenthood that besides providing abortions, offer
many other services, i.e., cancer screenings that many people in poorer
communities cannot afford.
So tell me again who needs to start
taking responsibility for their actions?
Friday, June 26, 2015
Kapps rants about bible thumpers and same-sex marriage.
WHOOOO!!!! Cats is HEATED over this same-sex marriage ruling! LOL When the same supreme-court came through and gutted the civil rights that protected voters no one said SHIT! Probably because they felt it didn't concern them. Now same-sex marriage is legal and all types of shit is being said, yet, unless they're gay it really doesn't concern them either. I'm seeing way too many post with bible verses, and talking about God's vengeance, and about how people will pay once they die. You know what, honestly? SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH THAT BECAUSE IT'S NONSENSE! If God is able to forgive genocidal murders with just a word, then he is not concerned about sending gay people to hell. That's that bullshit that many conservative/christian/evangelicals believe because they are afraid to think otherwise. And that's because thinking otherwise will get them sent to hell by their "loving god." I say this with confidence because all this biblical stuff getting thrown around is just someone's interpretation of things. No one has a definite lock on the Word of God, just what one person said that another person said, nothing other than that. If you choose to believe then good for you. It's good to have a belief in something. If you choose not to believe then, good for you too. You got bible "thumpers" swearing up and down that they know what is right. The thing is that they don't have the absolute word, just an interpretation. I consider myself a spiritual person, not a religious, because as the world and history has shown the chaos caused by religions, people don't know what the hell they're really talking about. Just what they think the word means to them. I believe in God, I believe in Jesus. Because, to me, to have that belief that there is a being that exist that is higher than yourself and can do impossible things gives you hope when all hope is lost. It gives you something to look up to when you feel overwhelmed. ------------ Again, I am so glad for the LGBT community with this ruling. I'm not gay, it doesn't really concern me, and I may not lose or gain anything from it, but I'm still happy for them. You see how that works? They world is not falling into chaos or ending. Stop pulling all this bible whining and crying shit every time something does not go your way. End of rant.
Monday, June 22, 2015
Why the Confederate flag represents, and the Civil War was about slavery
People, if you encounter ANYONE who says that the Civil War was NOT about slavery, but about states' rights and/or economic reasons, show them this. Better yet share this so we can put the argument to bed.
The "Confederate States of America - Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union." Simply put this declaration is why they seceded from the Union, and the following is an excerpt from that. Read it and you will see what "states' rights" and economic reasons they actually mean:
"We affirm that these ends for which this Government was instituted have been defeated, and the Government itself has been made destructive of them by the action of the non-slaveholding States. Those States have assume the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery; they have permitted open establishment among them of societies, whose avowed object is to disturb the peace and to eloign the property of the citizens of other States. They have encouraged and assisted thousands of our slaves to leave their homes; and those who remain, have been incited by emissaries, books and pictures to servile insurrection."
To sum it up, it says that non-slave-holding states are f*cknig things up for slave-holding states by saying that owning slaves is bad. These non-slave-holding states are also f*ckng up slave-holding states' "way of life" by educating, encouraging, and assisting slaves to escape or fight back.
So, there you go. Once again ignorance is defeated by knowledge. Make sure you share this people. The only way to overcome racism is to face it and defeat it.
Thanks,
B.
Sources:
The "Confederate States of America - Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union." Simply put this declaration is why they seceded from the Union, and the following is an excerpt from that. Read it and you will see what "states' rights" and economic reasons they actually mean:
"We affirm that these ends for which this Government was instituted have been defeated, and the Government itself has been made destructive of them by the action of the non-slaveholding States. Those States have assume the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery; they have permitted open establishment among them of societies, whose avowed object is to disturb the peace and to eloign the property of the citizens of other States. They have encouraged and assisted thousands of our slaves to leave their homes; and those who remain, have been incited by emissaries, books and pictures to servile insurrection."
To sum it up, it says that non-slave-holding states are f*cknig things up for slave-holding states by saying that owning slaves is bad. These non-slave-holding states are also f*ckng up slave-holding states' "way of life" by educating, encouraging, and assisting slaves to escape or fight back.
So, there you go. Once again ignorance is defeated by knowledge. Make sure you share this people. The only way to overcome racism is to face it and defeat it.
Thanks,
B.
Sources:
The Civil
War Home Page
Wednesday, June 17, 2015
As a The Walking Dead fan I feel SOOOO redeemed by this!
If you're a fan of The Walking Dead
then you saw the "cabin in the woods" episode where there was a
connection and what appeared to be a possible sexual attraction between
the two characters Daryl (Reedus) and Beth (Kinney) that was suddenly
ripped apart by an ultimately tragic set of events. The image pictured
here with this Us Weekly article replaces the last one we saw of them on the show.
Him carrying her, and her... you know... That was a traumatizing moment
for viewers. It was the first time I shouted "NOOOOOOO!!!!," during the
whole series and almost, ALMOST as traumatizing as the death of our
beloved Hershel. With Hershel's horrific demise it took a while to sink
in, and I was in disbelief for like a day after that. But back to Emily
and Norman. Honestly, and I know I'm not the only one, I hoped that the
two characters would have smashed, but it didn't happen. But now, if he
smashes in real life that's even better! I'm sittin' here like, "Yeah...
That... that's dope. Have a kid named 'Lil' Kick Ass.'"
Friday, April 10, 2015
Table of Brotherhood: Kappa's Facebook Post in Regards to, "I'm a redneck and I love America"
Amazing! It would be wrong for me not to share this. If you have been
skipping over this video you need to take a minute and watch it. I like
that he speaking from a position of experience and he verifies the
"privilege" that exist for those who are not "of color" that exist here
in America. I believe that a step in the right direction for this
country is for people to admit that this privilege DOES exist, even if
it is not in the same capacity for everyone affected by it. If
this is considered stirring the pot then I shall stir, stir away.
Recognizing and facing these differences is progress towards bringing us
all together. I was fortunate enough to be born in a country where the
population is diverse, and I love my black, white, Latino, Asian, Native
American brothers and sisters, as well as anyone else on this great big
ol' Earth that has love for me. The table of brotherhood has room for
all.
Thursday, April 9, 2015
Mirrors
I was in a department store a few days back and got a good look at myself in a fitting room mirror. Maybe it was the lighting, maybe it was that I was looking into a mirror in a place other than my own home, but the image that looked back at me actually startled me. "Is this what I look like?" Late 30's me trying to look like mid- 20's me?
My shirt was two sizes too large and my jeans were one one size too big. It was a look that, like I said, I could have pulled off 10 to 12 or so years earlier, but now I appeared to be swimming in the ensemble. Not to mention the fact that I hadn't shaved in a over a week allowed for the patchy growth of facial hair along with a failed attempt at growing a goatee on a face that just doesn't fair well in the symmetrical growth department gave me the appearance of some disheveled homeless vagrant.
I would think that this would be something that I would have caught many years ago. I mean, really?
It may have something to do with the fact that I don't really consider myself a "looker," and any time spent in front of a mirror are to make sure there's no food on my face, or when I do shave, that I didn't miss any spots. Other than that it's just passing glances.
As I write this I'm thinking to myself that maybe I was finally forced to look at my physical self because I was in this small, unfamiliar space with nothing else to focus on but the image of how people see me staring right back at me.
My shirt was two sizes too large and my jeans were one one size too big. It was a look that, like I said, I could have pulled off 10 to 12 or so years earlier, but now I appeared to be swimming in the ensemble. Not to mention the fact that I hadn't shaved in a over a week allowed for the patchy growth of facial hair along with a failed attempt at growing a goatee on a face that just doesn't fair well in the symmetrical growth department gave me the appearance of some disheveled homeless vagrant.
I would think that this would be something that I would have caught many years ago. I mean, really?
It may have something to do with the fact that I don't really consider myself a "looker," and any time spent in front of a mirror are to make sure there's no food on my face, or when I do shave, that I didn't miss any spots. Other than that it's just passing glances.
As I write this I'm thinking to myself that maybe I was finally forced to look at my physical self because I was in this small, unfamiliar space with nothing else to focus on but the image of how people see me staring right back at me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


